Kautilya

Evaluating reliability of some symmetric and asymmetric univariate filters

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Anusha
dc.date.accessioned 2016-02-15T13:33:31Z
dc.date.available 2016-02-15T13:33:31Z
dc.date.issued 2015-12
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2275/378
dc.description.abstract This paper examines statistical reliability of univariate filters for estimation of trend in leading indicators of cyclical changes. For this purpose, three measures are used: mean square error for quantitative accuracy, minimum revisions with additional data for statistical accuracy and directional accuracy to capture property of signaling cyclical movements. Our focus is on the widely used Hodrick-Prescott and Henderson filters and their generalizations to splines and RKHS(Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces) embedding respectively. Comparison of trend fitted by the filters is illustrated with Indian and US Industrial production data and a simulated data series. We find that although Henderson smoothers based on RKHS preform better than classical filter, they are not better than spline based methods on the selected criterion for Indian macroeconomic time series. Overall findings suggest that in cases when penalized splines converge in quasi real time, they are better than HP filter on the three criterion. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries WP;WP-2015-030
dc.subject Hodrick-Presscott filter en_US
dc.subject Penalized splines en_US
dc.subject Henderson smoothers in RKHS en_US
dc.subject end-of-sample reliability en_US
dc.subject leading indicators en_US
dc.title Evaluating reliability of some symmetric and asymmetric univariate filters en_US
dc.type Working Paper en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account