Abstract:
An SIIO paradigm, based on structure and ideas that become engraved in institutions and affect
outcomes, is developed to examine and assesses monetary policy in India after independence. Narrative
history, data analysis, and reporting of research demonstrate the dialectic between ideas and structure.
Exogenous supply shocks are used to identify policy shocks and isolate their effects. It turns out policy
was sometimes exceedingly tight when the common understanding was of a large monetary overhang.
Fiscal dominance made policy procyclical. But the three factors that cause a loss of monetary
autonomy—governments, markets and openness—are moderating each other. Markets moderate fiscal
profligacy and global crises moderate markets and openness. Greater current congruence between
ideas and structure is improving institutions and contributing to India’s better performance.
