dc.contributor.author |
Nathan, Hippu Salk Kristle |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Reddy, B. Sudhakara |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-06-01T10:32:31Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2012-06-01T10:32:31Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2012-06-01 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2275/117 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The selection of optimum number of indicators is the key to any Sustainable Development Indicator
(SDI) research. Indicators, too less in number may be inadequate to convey the message and; too many
may dilute the purpose. To arrive at a limited number of indicators from a larger set of potential ones, a
set of criteria is applied. In the past SDI-initiatives, emphasis was not laid on structuring criteria; these
were invariably considered in a linear way. This paper proposes a framework to organize criteria in a
tree fashion at successive levels. For each level, the weights of a criterion relative to others are
determined by following Analytical Hierarchy Process where experts’ opinions are considered. For
aggregation of scores, ‘displaced ideal’ method is proposed over linear additive model. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
WP;WP-2010-013 |
|
dc.subject |
What-How-Whom (WHW) framework |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Value tree |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Analytical Hierarchy Process |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Displaced ideal |
en_US |
dc.title |
Selection criteria for sustainable development indicators |
en_US |
dc.type |
Working Paper |
en_US |